Serogen or Ogoplex?
I'm trying to decide which product is best in producing the "ropes". I am so tired of false adds. Serogen or Ogoplex?
Can you help?
I'll be honest: Of all the bogus herbal sexual enhancers and performance boosters currently available, including the male orgasm enhancers, I endorse Serogen. Put it this way: If you are among the 35% of men that can breakdown and absorb "defined" pollen, you should see a difference.
As is always the case with these types of all-natural supplements, keep in mind results vary depending on an individual's genetics, age, and lifestyle.
If you take a peek at the product review section posted on my Web page (http://www.nancy-ann.com/product-reviews/), you can read why I've critiqued the products in the order listed: It's simple ... company credibility! Somalab appears to be (from what I researched) the first stateside distributor of Serogen (which contains Cernate, the supplement's potent formula of pure Swedish pollen extract). I also base my comments on the fact that Somalab has its own toll-free customer-care line where you can call and speak to an actual human with a name (most all the other distributors of similar products are strictly online-only entities!).
Ditto goes for Somalab confidently listing on its literature and Web site (see www.somalab.net) an actual physical postal address that IS NOT an anonymous P.O. box! These obvious clues prove the company must be registered to do business in the state in which it resides.
Buyer Beware: Always look for giveaways such as a telephone contact and/or an actual land address when shopping on the Web. This holds true for EVERYTHING from herbal sexual enhancers to car stereos. Think about it: would you willingly give out your personal details and credit card information to an anonymous entity that cannot be contacted by phone or reached by certified mail?
Truth in Letter-writing
Antoine writes:
I have seen the letter about the "ropes" in several magazines. I've seen it in a weight lifting magazine, other health-related magazines, and adult publications. Each time the story changes and seems to be more intense. Is this merely marketing promotional or is this letter true? If so, why does its content change from time to time?
Via Internet
The original letter is indeed real. It's kind of become one of those "discovery" letters (industry lore) that launched a bunch of knock-off products. The first supplement that contained "defined" flower pollen was Serogen, and the company that mentioned "increasing your ropes" was a small import/export company called "Somalab." Somalab was the first company to import this "defined" pollen. Once it was proven that the product was effective (it always takes a maverick willing to take a risk) bigger companies with more resources and money started to knock off Serogen with cheaper blends and use the term "ropes" just as Somalab does.
Remember, Serogen is the original; although there are many copycats, their blends are different and inferior. All of Somalab's products are credible, original, and its Serogen line is the most effective orgasm enhancer on the market.
Contradictory Claims
Nancy-Ann,
I have seen so many contradictory claims on various Web sites I have visited regarding Serogen, Ogoplex, Ropex, and others. I have yet to find any quantitative information on purity and dose of the active ingredients in any orgasm enhancers.
It would be nice to see fully documented and quantitative reports on "double blind" tests of the effectiveness of any sex enhancing product versus placebo in clinical trials. The ideal test would be where two groups are .selected one using the product and the other using sugar pills for a month or two or whatever and documenting quantitatively the sex frequency numbers, length of orgasm, rope count and recovery time for multiple orgasms. Then the rolls of the two groups are reversed and the test is repeated so that offset bias between the two groups is removed. Then the test could also compare effectiveness between different products, document the results and give product ingredient quantitative information so that the consumer can objectively compare them.
Is such data available? Could you forward it to me via email? If not could you give me a referral or point of contact for such data?
Don
There are a few clinical studies on cernitin (which is a generic form of the most popular Swedish flower pollen) and various groups of men with either benign prostate problems or sperm mobility issues. None I could find on the sexual effects of standardized pollen. My thinking is there would never be any UNBIASED studies comparing this type of sexual enhancer (the main reason it costs money for a third party to accomplish such a "scientific" task). Reviews on each product could be conducted, of course (and they are), but they are entirely biased and ultimately cannot be substantiated. I say this because all men are different and the end result is based on what each individual's "ideal" of just what and how much was "enhanced." (It's not much different as reading a wide variety of largely differing movie reviews: They are based on the critics "idea" of what they thought about the same movie.
I know because I conducted my first product review on male orgasm enhancers (click on my "product review" link). As you'll see, the reviews are based on the legitimacy of the distributors themselves, customer care, pricing, packaging and quantity (which, I've found, most always reflects the quality of the products sold).
Finding a group of men, having them try each product for a month, letting them cycle off for a month, then onto the next, and so on and so forth ... would take considerable time and effort for all parties involved. And still it would biased by a myriad amount of variables (one of which I mentioned above). Gathering all the products and having a third-party laboratory break down each formula in order to find which herbal amalgamation is superior, is, as I mentioned, is simply too expensive.
Pages
Categories
Tags
